Monday, August 28, 2006

Arab Racism

bismillah
assalamu alaikum

A few days ago I was with an Arab brother who while talking mentioned something that showed he has a slight dislike of black people. This came to me as no surprise as I am an Arab and I know how alot of Arabs think. However, I decided to not let this one go without the proper verbal beating it deserved. He told me he agrees that all people are the same, however people from central and South Africa never did have any historic achievements and have always been a backwards people whilst the rest of the world at least had a period where they achieved something.

First and foremost there is nothing in the Quraan and Sunnah that says there are any distinctions between white people and black people. On the contrary, in the prophet's last sermon he (pbuh) said;
""All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white (person) has no superiority over a black (person) nor a black has any superiority over a white except by piety and good action."

Also Allah (swt) said:
"And mankind is naught but a single nation."
Holy Quran 2:213

Although this should be enough to silence any Muslim's racist seed, I will not stop there to make you realise how silly that idea is.

I was told that the black people didn't achieve anything throughout history. Although that point is wrong in itself, the Central and South Africans had several great empires, let me ask just for the sake of argument; why is that? Is it because of a gene in the black people that makes them unsuccessful? If so, then that would directly imply that white people, who did achieve something in history (although that is wrong in itself and I will get to that later) have a gene that makes them successful. But are we?? Let us look at the Europeans. When did they achieve anything in the past? You have two periods where the Europeans actually achieved something, in the ancient times under the Roman Empire and the Greek Empire and the more modern times after the Reneissance and the removal of the tyranical Church. Let's take this step by step. First of all in ancient history the one thing that the Romans and the Greeks had in common is that they had (to a degree) a democratic system in place, and they achieved something with that. The rest of Europe? The rest of Europe were a bunch of barbarian nomad nobodies. The Saxons? The Celts? The Goths? The Vikings? What did the rest of Europe do? Absolutly nothing! And then we have the Reniessance. It was a period, again, when relative freedom after the oppression of the Church was gradually being given to the people. It was a time when the leadership and the governing body of the Church are removed and replaced by a more lenient and independant leadership. In both cases we see the effect of the governing body on the achievements the people are bringing forth.

Now the Arabs, what were they before Islam? They were a bunch of warring desert tribes half of which were controled by the Romans and the other half by the Persians. After Islam came, nay, after Islam was implemented, the Arabs united and fought and conquered both their previous masters, the Romans and the Persians. It is when Islam ruled them that they actually became of any significance and it is the day that Islamic rule left them that they went back to becoming several warring tribes ruled by foreign masters, be that the US, France or Britain.

I say it alot and I will say it again. The people are a reflection of the governing body. If a certain people were not achieving then it is not because they were created a lowly creature. That is not only incredibly stupid, but also a great haraam. All people are the same as we are all the children of Adam and Eve.

If a certain people were not achieving, ask yourself "why?" Are they not humans like the rest of us? If you claim that they do not achieve because of their colour or any biological matter, then you are claiming that it is a genetic matter. If so, then why aren't the rest of humanity failing as well? And if it is indeed genetic, then how come we succeed at times and fail at other times? The most obvious example are the Arabs who succeeded at one point of their history and the rest was utter garbage. It does not make sense, it is absolutly silly, and most importantly it is haraam! And if the white people have a "gene of success", then why aren't all white people successful? Take Western Europe and Eastern Europe. The only thing I can think of is that Western Europe has a more democratic governmant than the East. And if today the Eastern Europeans are growing, it is because they finally let go of the shackles of Communism. Again, back to the same point; the governing body!

wassalam

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

comment by A;
Subhaen Allah! well said and thanks for addressing the topic.

In the past I used to quickly say those who don't submit to right teaching are not of the submitters (not Muslims). You told me to not be so quick with it. You are right. In the past I might have said that those who hold ethnic/racial predjudice are not of the Muslims. Now I would simply say that such are acting against Islam.

It is sometimes hard to accept our brothers when they do not accept others of our brothers in equality.

May we be Rehmetlik to all our brothers (merciful).

Rahmat; Allehu Akbar!

8/28/2006 05:51:00 PM  
Blogger FreeCyprus said...

Abdul, bravo.
Wonderful post.

I will be linking to it here:

Iraq: Death Squads & Democracy

And here:

This I Believe...

8/28/2006 06:14:00 PM  
Blogger Muslim Unity said...

Dear brother,

I liked a few words a lot from your post- so I used them at Muslim Unity.
I hope you don't mind.

8/28/2006 08:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

From A: off the subject, here is the latest on the Imam in south Kyrgyzstan:

Thursday , 31 August 2006


Obschestvenny Reiting (Bishkek)
Kyrgyz Ombusdman Tursunbaj Bakir uulu does not believe in coincidences particularly when imams of the Qorasuv mosque get killed. "I suspect that Kamalov was shot without so much as attempt to arrest him first, perhaps even with encouragement from Uzbek secret services. It solved the problem of the man who had upset official Tashkent," Bakir uulu said in an interview with the newspaper Obschestvenny Reiting.

Imam Muhammadrafik Kamalov was killed in the course of the special operation run by Kyrgyz and Uzbek secret services on August 6. The authorities later concluded that the theologian must have been taken hostage and shot by mistake. Official investigation is under way.

"When the tragedy occurred, we began receiving phone calls from the imam's relatives and close acquaintances," Bakir uulu said. "They all said that the information they possessed contradicted the official hypothesis of Kamalov's demise. According to the callers, three shots were fired at the imam. By the way, I already received a CD showing the imam's body. I will study the video in the near future. What I've been told by the callers in the meantime indicates that the imam was shot at point blank from the back. His family even says that the last round was fired in the back of the head, just to make sure of the death, you know. When the family was finally permitted to retrieve the body (with help from American journalists), they saw bodies of the two gunmen allegedly killed together with Kamalov. Well, they say that these two bodies were in so advanced a state of decay that being near them was nearly impossible. The imam's body on the contrary was "fresh" for want of a better term. It was clear that it had been brought to the morgue only recently. How could they all be in one and the same car? Kamalov's relatives suspect that he was deliberately murdered and that these two bodies were planted nearby so as to mount religious tension in the southern part of the country," Bakir uulu said.

Ferghana News Agency, 31 August 2006

9/02/2006 07:17:00 AM  
Anonymous neverland said...

I just don't know HOW COLOR makes us different? I swear I have no clue how people think that they are based on the color of their skin???

9/02/2006 07:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A says:
Actually, I think it is seldom a color issue and almost always a cultural pride issue. In an ethic nationalism laden world every culture lifts itself up in a blasphemous form of idolatry against Allah talla. People learn with pride of their cultural superiority and of others inferiority. Color is just a convenient distinguishing feature, but not the root cause.

Ethnic nationalism is idolotry and leads to hell with the other polythiests. A religious Affilliation does not safeguard. Follow the prophet and prophets and submit to God, and recieve such as do the same as Muslim brothers. 'an ARAB HAS NO SUPERIORITY... IT IS PIOTY AND CHARACTER ALONE THAT MAKE ONE GREAT!

9/03/2006 10:55:00 PM  
Blogger Abdul Rahman Hilmi said...

bismillah
assalamu alaikum
First I do apologise to everyone for the late reply.

My brother A;
I agree with you, people who hold racial predjudice are hard to 'swallow' but I would generally always think that they are the result of the absence of Islam from life. In Islam, during a time of drought or starvation, the penalty of theft is removed (at least the theft of food as far as I am aware of and may Allah correct me if I was wrong). Therefor circumstances play a role in the human psychy and Allah (swt) saw that and understands that and thus implements that in the Shariah. Likewise, without the proper Islamic education, we really shouldn't expect the Muslims to be walking around like the sahaabaa. And yet, how can we bring about Islamic schools if there are people who doesn't find anything to eat, let alone learn how to read. May Allah bless us with the shade of his shariah inshallah sooner instead of later.

freecyprus
thank you and you are welcomed here!

brother Muslim Unity
welcome and as I said in your blog, you can take whatever you want from here without any permission.

brother A
subhaan Allah! may Allah grant him paradise. Inshallah he is happy now under the shade of Allah. Those tyrants live a life of fear from their own people and when they die they will live an afterlife of torture and misery. May Allah curse them!

my sister Neverland
just as brother A has said, mashallah. I would also like to add that such enemity exist because people hate differences. First it's skin colour, then it's Communist or Capitalist, then it's your relgious belief. In Britain there are facist parties like the BNP who say that Islam and Muslims should leave the country. I am certain that when that happens, they will start saying that Hindus should leave. And when that happens, they will start saying that Black people should leave. And so on until it's an issue of eye colour even! Some times there has to be an enemy, something to make the people afraid of. But that's a long discussion that requires a new topic.

wassalam

9/10/2006 03:30:00 PM  
Anonymous qolbi said...

Bismillah..
Assalamu'alaikum.
All muslim and mu'min should know what it says "Rahmatan lil 'Alamin"...am I right??? so,Islam came for human mankind,not just for one race.

4/06/2009 11:53:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

الاقصى